| People v Garrett |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 01122 |
| Decided on February 26, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Jeffrey D. Cohen, Kew Gardens, NY, for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Ellen C. Abbot, and Julien Gutierrez of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ira H. Margulis, J.), dated May 16, 2024, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
After a hearing conducted pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA), the Supreme Court assessed the defendant 80 points, rendering him a presumptive level two sex offender, and designated the defendant a level two sex offender.
The defendant's contention that he is entitled to a downward departure to a risk level one designation based upon purported mitigating factors is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to request a downward departure at the SORA hearing (see People v Franco, _____ AD3d _____, 2025 NY Slip Op 00119; People v Pomavilla-Loja, 230 AD3d 1359, 1359; People v Valencia, 225 AD3d 637, 637). In any event, the defendant failed to establish that a downward departure is warranted (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender.
IANNACCI, J.P., FORD, DOWLING and HOM, JJ., concur.
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Cour